(i) The Belgium Constitution provides that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in the Central Government. Contrary to it, leaders of the Sinhala community in Sri Lanka sought to secure dominance over government by virtue of their majority and refused to share power with the Tamils.
How did Belgium and Sri Lanka handle power sharing class 10?
The Belgian leaders recognised the existence of regional differences and cultural diversities and resorted to a different path. They amended their constitution 4 times between 1970 and 1993. This was done to work out an innovative arrangement that would enable everyone to live together within the same country.
How was the system of power sharing differently followed in Belgium and Sri Lanka?
(i) In Belgium, the government does not follow preferential policies in matters of jobs and education. In Sri Lanka, the government follows preferential policies in matters of government, jobs and education. … In Sri Lanka, the major political parties are not sensitive to the language and culture of the Tamils.
How did Belgium deal with the question of power sharing?
The government in Belgium divided the powers equally between Dutch and French speaking populations. It was decided that equal representation should be given to the French- and Dutch-speaking population. Thus, there were equal numbers of ministers belonging to both communities in the Central Government.
Which dealt with the question of power sharing differently?
How have Belgium and sri lanka dealt with the question of power sharing differently? Belgium and Sri Lanka are democratic countries having diverse social setups. Yet, both took completely different approaches when it came to sharing of power.
How was accommodation done in Belgium?
1. Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French speaking ministers shall be equal in the central government. The French speaking people accepted equal representation in Brussels because the Dutch speaking community has accepted equal representation in the central government. …
How did Sri Lankan and Belgium government try to solve the ethnic problem?
Ans. (i) The Belgium leaders tried to solve the ethnic problem by respecting the feelings and interests of different communities and regions, whereas the Sri Lankan government tried to solve the problem through majoritarianism.
What is the difference between Belgium and Sri Lanka with regard to question of power sharing?
Answer : Belgium is a small country in Europe and shares its border with Netherlands, France, and Germany. It has a population of over one crore. … Sri Lanka which is located a few kilometers off the southern coast of Tamil Nadu has a population of two crores.
How the people of Belgium solve their problem of linguistic differences with power sharing?
c. The Belgium Government provided for a separate government in Brussels with equal representation to both linguistic communities that is the French and dutch. … Belgium also provided for a community government elected by people belonging to one language community – Dutch, French and German-speaking.
How was Sri Lanka different from Belgium in making the discussion of their communities?
Sri Lanka was different from Belgium in making the decisions of their communities as Sri Lanka provided more power to their major community (Sinhalese) and comparatively less power to minor community (Tamils) whereas Belgium provided equal and appropriate power to all the communities (French-speaking, Dutch-speaking ..
How did Belgium solve its problem successfully?
Students preparing for the upcoming exam will find these questions extremely helpful. Q1- Belgium solved its problem successfully by: Developing the power-sharing mechanism. Rejecting the policy of majoritarianism.
Answer: Community Government’ in Belgium is a good example of this type of power sharing among different social groups.
What are the main features of power sharing arrangement made in Belgium?
Power sharing arrangements made by Belgium are: *constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French speaking ministers shall be equal in the central government. * many powers of the central government have been given to state government. *state government were not subordinate to central government.
What do you understand by Belgium model examine the main elements of the Belgian model of power sharing?
The main features of Belgium model are: (i) **Equal distribution of seats—**According to the new arrangement, Dutch and French speaking ministers have been given equal status in the central government. No single majority can make decision unilaterally. … (iv) Community Government.
Why Belgium model is considered as an ideal example of power sharing?
Answer Expert Verified
1-The state governments are not subordinate to the central which means they are not answerable to them. 2-Many powers of the central are given to the states. 3-The Dutch and the French enjoy a majority over each other in the whoe nation and the capital respectively .
Power-sharing ensures the right balance between different sections in the society. It not only prevents conflict between various groups in the society but it also generates a sense of belongingness among them to the society. Hence, power-sharing helps to maintain the spirt of democracy.