Why was Elizabeth reluctant to help Dutch rebels?

Elizabeth I was reluctant to help Dutch Protestant rebels in the Netherlands. She wanted to avoid anything that could lead to war with Spain. Instead, she hoped to apply pressure on the Spanish to encourage them to agree to return the Netherlands to how they had been governed under an agreement made in 1548.

How did Queen Elizabeth react to the Dutch rebellion?

Elizabeth secretly supported the Dutch rebels because she knew the Dutch revolt would keep the Spanish too busy to threaten England. Elizabeth sent an army to help the Dutch rebels fight Spain. For the first time English and Spanish armies were fighting each other. England and Spain were now at war.

Why did Elizabeth not want the Dutch rebels to be defeated by Spain?

While England had unofficially been supporting the Dutch for years, Elizabeth had not officially supported the Dutch because she was afraid it might aggravate Spain into a war. However, the year before, the French Catholic League had signed a treaty with Spain to destroy the French Protestants.

IT IS AMAZING:  What leads to ethnic tension in Belgium?

Who was pressuring Elizabeth to help Dutch Protestant rebels?

Tensions in the Netherlands increased greatly between 1576 and 1584. Elizabeth increased her financial commitment to the cause of the Dutch rebels and hired mercenary soldiers to intervene in the conflict under the leadership of John Casimir.

How effectively did Elizabeth deal with the threat from Spain?

Its complete failure effectively ended any threat England faced from Spain. Elizabeth did not follow up this success. Despite the advice of the ‘sea dogs’, she knew that England needed a strong (but non-threatening) Spain to counter-balance France.

Who did Elizabeth send to help the Dutch?

In early 1578, with Elizabeth unwilling use English forces after the defeat of the Protestant Dutch army at the Battle of Gembloux and concerned about such a move provoking the French, she approached the Duke with funds to recruit “6,000 Swiss and 5,000 ‘reiters’ to the provinces” to assist the Dutch.

Why did the threat to Elizabeth increase after 1566?

‘The main reason why the Catholic threat to Elizabeth I increased after 1566 was due to the Dutch Revolt’. How far do you agree? Elizabeth had been in power for eight years by 1566 and it was at this time that the Catholic threat began to increase.

Why was the Puritan challenge a failure?

Puritan priests rejected the surplice as it was used by Catholics. This became a problem as the Act of Uniformity had made it the law for priests to wear one. … Elizabeth ordered the Archbishop of Canterbury to make sure that surplices were being worn properly. Any refusal meant the loss of jobs or being arrested.

IT IS AMAZING:  Best answer: Is Luxembourg expensive for international students?

Why was Scotland a threat to Elizabeth?

Mary, Queen of Scots was a threat to Elizabeth’s rule because she had two claims to the English throne: Many people believed Elizabeth to be illegitimate and so felt she had no right to be on the throne. … Elizabeth had converted England’s official religion to Protestantism , leaving many Catholics disgruntled.

Why were Puritans unhappy with the religious settlement?

The Puritan Challenge. Puritans believed that worship and prayer should be plain and simple. … The Religious Settlement did not enforce the Puritan view of church layout, decorations or the dress of preachers. The main areas that puritans disagreed with were the allowance of crucifixes and vestments.

Why did Elizabeth go on progresses?

Despite various political crises and dangers, she travelled nearly every summer of her 44-year reign, staying at some 241 different places from Hampshire to the Midlands. She did so partly to escape the diseases that could descend on London in the heat of summer.

How many rebels did Elizabeth execute?

Elizabeth put 800 rebels to death and the two Earls fled to Scotland.

How did Elizabethan authorities try to help the poor?

They were allowed to collect taxes in order to help the poor and unemployed. For much of the century the authorities grouped people into either the ‘impotent poor’ or the able-bodied poor’: … It was thought many able-bodied poor were lazy, idle and threatened the established social order.